April 7, 2010
Pogrom by Redneck Jews
"God Loves You - If You Are Jewish"
[SOURCE]:
Matthew Wagner, The Jerusalem Post
Shapira's distinction between Jewish, gentile blood
Nathan Jeffay, The Forward
After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
"For God so loved the World, that he gave his only begotten Son"
John 3:16
"God does not love the World, only the Jews"
Jewish beliefs of the Israeli settlement of Yitzhar in the West Bank, Israel
"Pogroms are always what Christians do to Jews"
Pure propaganda of the media-Scribes!
Definition of "Pogrom"
A "pogrom" is fancy Jewish word for a lynch mob.
A "pogrom" is vigilante justice.
A "pogrom" is an otherwise law-abiding community of citizens who are so fed-up with elements of their society who frequently, flagrantly and proudly break the laws and morals of the community, which their own leaders will neither address nor correct.
In other words, a "pogrom" is not just a riot, but an action by a group of concerned citizens who takes the law into their own hands.
Moral Equivalence
OLD: Czarist troops stand-by as Christians have pogrom against Jews
NEW: IDF troops stand-by as Jews have pogrom against Non-Jews
In the "Wild West" West Bank Jewish settlement of Yitzhar on Sept 13, 2008, machine-gun wielding Jewish rednecks had a pogrom against a neighboring non-Jewish Palestinian village.
Like the Czarist troops who stood by as Russian Christian peasants committed Pogroms against Jews following the assassination of Czar Alexander the Liberator, the Christian Czar who had emancipated all the Russian Serfs, so too did the Israeli Defense Forces stand by watching the Jewish pogrom in progress by Jews against the Gentile Palestinians without maintaining the peace they were responsible for keeping under international law.
Such is the reputation of Israeli settlement Yitzhar.
Haifa, Israel — A weekend of violence in the West Bank, igniting what Prime Minister Ehud Olmert likened to an anti-Palestinian “pogrom,” has touched off a public uproar over the state of law enforcement in the territories and the proper role of Israel’s security forces.
On Saturday morning, September 13, a series of confrontations began when a Palestinian man entered the Jewish settlement of Yitzhar, south of Nablus. He torched a Jewish home that was unoccupied at the time and then stabbed a 9-year-old child. Settlers responded by storming the nearby Arab village where the attacker was presumed to live, reportedly stoning cars and windows and firing at passers-by, several of whom were wounded. A villager captured the rampage on a video that showed Israeli troops looking on without intervening.
-- After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
Moral Equivalence
OLD: Pogroms by Christians against Jews are condemned in America
NEW" Pogroms by Jews against Non-Jews are not condemned in America
During the Czar's days, American Jews put tremendous pressure upon our Christian President to exert all the power and might America could muster against the Christian Czar to stop the pogroms against Jews in Russia.
As reported, without condemnation, by American newspaper "The Forward", the Jewish pogrom was not a "crime of passion" mindlessly committed without forethought, but premeditated, as the official spokesman of Yitzhar defended the pogrom against their Palestinian neighbors as both legal and moral.
There is no Jewish pressure for America to force Israel to stop the pogroms against non-Jews in the West Bank.
Yitzhar’s community spokesman, Yigal Amitai, admitted in a September 17 interview with the Forward that settlers broke windows and damaged property. “This is correct, natural, moral and shows that Jews are not in galut [exile] but in their homeland,” he remarked.
“We are always prepared to be the attackers, not the victims,” he said.
-- After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
Moral Equivalence
OLD: The Pope condemned for not standing up to Hitler's troops
NEW: Rabbi condemns Israeli IDF troops not helping in the pogrom
"Hitler's Pope" was portrayed as a puppet of Hitler. Jewish media-Scribes continously condemn the Catholic Church for not doing enough against Hitler's pogrom.
Not satisfied that the IDF did not stop them from their pogrom against non-Jews, Religious leader Rabbi David Dudkevitch told the Israeli Defense Forces that it should not just stand by while the pogrom against the Palestinians was in place, but should join in to help the Jews in their pogrom.
Jewish religious leaders are agitating for an expansion of the pogroms against non-Jews.
Their religious leader, Rabbi David Dudkevitch, told Haaretz on September 15 that “the proper and healthy thing” is for “the Israel Defense Forces to be involved not only in apprehending terror suspects, but also in collective punishment, up to the level of reprisals, of the environment that supports terror.”
-- -- After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
Moral Equivalence
OLD: Christian civilians afraid of Hitler's troops
NEW: IDF troops afraid of Jewish civilians
In Hitler's day, Christian civilians were condemned for being afraid to stand up to Hitler's soldiers.
In Israel today, Israeli soldiers are afraid to stand up to Jewish civilians with submachine guns engaging in violent pogroms against non-Jews.
Others see the problem as more intractable. According to Peace Now general secretary Yariv Oppenheimer, “There is a fear among Israeli soldiers and in the army to confront settlers. They know that settlers can bring more people and more clashes.”
-- After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
Moral Equivalence
OLD: Nuremberg Judgment:
"Thou Shalt Not Murder" applies to Hitler killing Jews
NEW: Yitzhar Judgment:
"Thou Shalt Not Murder" applies only "to a Jew who kills a Jew"
With Stalin, the orchestrator of the Holodomor horror of 7 million dead Ukrainian Christians, looking on as our ally, the West condemned Hitler for the Holocaust of 6 million Jews and accused his regime of crimes against humanity.
Over a year after the Czarist and Hitlerite Jewish pogroms, the redneck Jews of Yitzhar are still unrepentant. Still free to commit more pogroms.
Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yosef Elitzur have a religious belief that closely resembles that of the Muslim clerics we have been hearing so much as of late, where Muslim clerics say that it is the duty of Muslims to kill all Infidels.
Christian morality does not seem to apply in Jewish Yitzhar as the rabbis of Yitzhar all but say that 'Thou Shalt Not Murder'" applies only "to a Jew who kills a Jew."
While religious Zionists are primarily concerned with the issue of evacuating settlements, the students at Od Yosef Chai also see IDF ethics as problematic because they are based on "western" or "Christian" morality that equates Jewish lives with those of non-Jews.
-- Shapira's distinction between Jewish, gentile blood
Moral Equivalence
OLD: Hitler Final Solution : Kill the innocent Jewish children
NEW: Yitzhar Final Solution: Kill the innocent non-Jewish children
We were told that Hitler wanted to rid the world of the threat of Jews once and for all -- The World shuttered.
We are told that Iran's Amadinejad wants to rid the world of the threat of the Jews once and for all -- The World shutters.
Jewish reporters tell us that Israel's Yitzhar wants to rid the world of non-Jews -- The World Yawns.
Some of the guidelines mentioned at the back of the book in a section entitled "Conclusions - Chapter Five: The Killing of Gentiles in War," include the following: "There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side] even if they have not transgressed the seven Noahide Laws [to believe in God, not to commit idolatry, murder, theft or adultery, to set up a legal system, and not to tear a limb from a live animal] because of the future danger they may present, since it is assumed that they will grow up to be evil like their parents...."
-- Shapira's distinction between Jewish, gentile blood
CONCLUSION
If you are like me, you get tired of hearing all the time what some so-called Christians did to a small village of always "totally innocent Jews" in another country in another time, and so I thought it would be good for Christians to hear what "totally innocent Jews" are doing today in the nation of Israel, a country most Christians consider to be honorable and righteous.
By the way, I needed to mention that Jews today do not necessarily believe that their arch enemies, the Amelekites, are an unknown and extinct people. Not all Jews believe this.
In the recent Jewish-made movie, "One Night with the King", the story of Hadassah (Esther), Esther saves the Jewish people from annihilation at the hands of their arch enemy -- and the movie clearly says that the arch enemy of the Jews are the Amalekites -- still alive and still a threat to the Jewish people.
So, in my mind, ANY ENEMY of the Jews are considered to be Amalekites and therefor, Jews believe that God allows them to kill these enemies down to the last man, woman, child, and ox.
Indeed, as God was angry then at Saul for keeping King Agag of Amalek alive, God would be angry today if Jews spared the life of even the children of Israel's enemies.
The beliefs of the Rabbis and Jews in Israel bears this out, for they are indeed still fighting a 4,000 year-old war in their minds, even to this day.
ORIGINAL REFERENCE
Shapira's distinction between Jewish, gentile blood
Rabbi Yitzhak Shapira, who was detained for questioning by the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) in connection with the burning of a mosque in Yasuf, a village near Nablus, is head of the Od Yosef Chai Yeshiva in Yitzhar, and is a disciple of Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsberg, who lives in Kfar Chabad.
Ginsberg is considered by scholars of modern Jewish thought to be an original and important thinker in the fields of hassidut and Kabbala, though he is best known for his extreme views on the fundamental and inherent differences between Jews and non-Jews, which some say smack of racism.
Shapira, who grew up in Kedumim, learned in religious-Zionist yeshivot, first in Merkaz Harav's High School and later in Merkaz Harav's yeshiva for older students.
His brother, Rabbi Yehoshua Shapira, is the head of the Ramat Gan Hesder Yeshiva.
Under the influence of Ginsberg, Shapira has deviated from mainstream religious Zionism. It can be detected not only in his dress - the long black Prince Albert frock coat and black hat favored by Chabad Hassidim - it is also apparent in his thought.
While religious Zionists tend to emphasize the importance of cooperating with secular Zionists in the building and protection of the Jewish state, Shapira and his students are concerned with maintaining what they consider the purity and authenticity of Jewish teachings and practice.
For instance, the students at Od Yosef Chai are more likely to avoid performing military service out of concern that they will be forced to follow orders that contradict Halacha.
While religious Zionists are primarily concerned with the issue of evacuating settlements, the students at Od Yosef Chai also see IDF ethics as problematic because they are based on "western" or "Christian" morality that equates Jewish lives with those of non-Jews.
In sharp contrast to the Goldstone Report, which criticizes the IDF for purportedly committing "war crimes" against Palestinians during Operation Cast Lead, Od Yosef Chai's criticism of the IDF is totally different.
IDF battlefield ethics are seen as immoral not because they allow for the killing of innocent bystanders but because they force Jewish soldiers to needlessly endanger themselves to protect gentiles.
The measures taken by the IDF to protect non-combatants, such as using ground forces to weed out terrorists embedded in highly populated civilian areas so as to minimize collateral damage, are viewed by Shapira as downright evil, because they lead to the needless injury or death of Jewish soldiers.
In his preface to the controversial book Torat Hamelech [The King's Torah], authored by Shapira and Rabbi Yosef Elitzur, Ginsberg points out the tremendous need to illuminate the fundamental differences between Jew and gentile "at a time when we are obligated to conquer [the land of Israel] from our enemies so that we can act as we need to in the spirit of Torah and so that we can strengthen the spirit of the nation and its soldiers."
Some of the guidelines mentioned at the back of the book in a section entitled "Conclusions - Chapter Five: The Killing of Gentiles in War," include the following: "There is a reason to kill babies [on the enemy side] even if they have not transgressed the seven Noahide Laws [to believe in God, not to commit idolatry, murder, theft or adultery, to set up a legal system, and not to tear a limb from a live animal] because of the future danger they may present, since it is assumed that they will grow up to be evil like their parents...."
In all of its 230 pages, the book makes no mention of Arabs or Palestinians. However, a group of moderate religious Zionist groups calling themselves the "Twelfth of Heshvan," named after the Hebrew date of prime minister Yitzhak Rabin's assassination, are concerned that the book's teachings will not remain purely theoretical.
The have petitioned the High Court to order Attorney-General Menahem Mazuz to confiscate the books and arrest its authors for incitement.
ORIGINAL REFERENCE
After ‘Pogrom,’ Israel Debates Who Controls Settler Violence
Haifa, Israel — A weekend of violence in the West Bank, igniting what Prime Minister Ehud Olmert likened to an anti-Palestinian “pogrom,” has touched off a public uproar over the state of law enforcement in the territories and the proper role of Israel’s security forces.
On Saturday morning, September 13, a series of confrontations began when a Palestinian man entered the Jewish settlement of Yitzhar, south of Nablus. He torched a Jewish home that was unoccupied at the time and then stabbed a 9-year-old child. Settlers responded by storming the nearby Arab village where the attacker was presumed to live, reportedly stoning cars and windows and firing at passers-by, several of whom were wounded. A villager captured the rampage on a video that showed Israeli troops looking on without intervening.
The images of Israeli forces failing to protect Palestinians touched off a national debate over settler violence and over the responses by Israeli police and military. Both security services initially disclaimed responsibility and blamed each other for what Olmert likened to a “pogrom.”
“There will be no pogroms against non-Jewish residents in the State of Israel,” Olmert declared at a September 14 Cabinet meeting.
At a stormy meeting of the Knesset’s Internal Affairs Committee on September 15, committee chair Ophir Pines-Paz of Labor said that the West Bank has become “like the Wild West.”
“The picture is one of anarchy,” the lawmaker said.
Among politicians and in the media, there was a strong sense that however reprehensible the settlers’ actions, such attacks are to be expected and should be anticipated by the authorities, given mounting radicalism on both sides.
“According to international law, the one in charge of upholding the law in the West Bank is the army,” said Israel’s leading legal expert on the West Bank, attorney Talia Sasson. “But army soldiers are not interested in enforcing the law among Israelis.” Sasson, a former head of the criminal division of the State Prosecutor’s Office, wrote an important 2005 government report on policy in the territories.
The weekend’s violence began early in the day on September 13 after a terrorist entered the settlement of Yitzhar, considered a stronghold of Kahanists and Chabad messianists. He is thought to have come from the nearby Arab village of Asira el-Kibliyeh.
He broke into the home of the Ben-Shlomo family, who were away. In what Yitzhar residents said was the seventh arson attack by Asira el-Kibliyeh residents in recent months, he burned the home. He tried to break in next door at the home of the Ofer family, but homeowner Roital Ofer shuttered the windows.
When the terrorist then saw 9-year-old Tuvia Shatman walking to the Sabbath morning service at synagogue, he stabbed the child five times and threw him down a ravine. The boy is in now in stable condition at home.
Within two hours of the stabbing, more than two dozen Yitzhar residents entered Asira el-Kibliyeh, reportedly looking for revenge. They allegedly shot into the air and at villagers, smashed windows and destroyed a car. Press reports stated that eight Palestinians were wounded, including two moderately hurt by live fire.
Yitzhar’s community spokesman, Yigal Amitai, admitted in a September 17 interview with the Forward that settlers broke windows and damaged property. “This is correct, natural, moral and shows that Jews are not in galut [exile] but in their homeland,” he remarked.
“We are always prepared to be the attackers, not the victims,” he said.
Police, who as of press time had made no arrests, were not present during the retaliation. Videos filmed by Palestinians on cameras distributed by the human rights organization B’Tselem indicate that soldiers looked on and failed to control the violence.
As most of Israel began to question why the soldiers failed to act, Yitzhar’s settlers launched their own criticism of the army. Their religious leader, Rabbi David Dudkevitch, told Haaretz on September 15 that “the proper and healthy thing” is for “the Israel Defense Forces to be involved not only in apprehending terror suspects, but also in collective punishment, up to the level of reprisals, of the environment that supports terror.”
On the more widespread criticism — that soldiers failed to protect the villagers — the army initially responded to a September 16 Forward query by saying that all matters relating to settlers are under the jurisdiction of the police. But the police claimed that responsibility lies with the army.
Police say the only powers the department has for maintaining law and order in the West Bank devolve to it from the army.
“The authority is the authority of the army,” said police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld. The local press commented that army and police sources blamed each other for failing to control the riot.
A statement later sent to the Forward by the army said that soldiers “successfully drove the settlers out of the Palestinian village” and are always responsible for quelling violence. With 100 soldier complaints against settlers currently under police investigation — though it is not clear what proportion are due to conduct against soldiers and what proportion against Palestinians — “it is baseless to say that IDF soldiers do not take part in the enforcement of laws against public disturbances,” the statement said.
Confusion over who is responsible for controlling settler violence is causing alarm in the Knesset. Extremist settlers “do whatever they want, and no one knows what to do with them, including the establishment,” Meretz lawmaker Yossi Beilin told the Knesset’s Internal Affairs Committee.
Asked who is the “sovereign entity” in the West Bank, Pines-Paz said “the feeling is as though the IDF and the police are playing pingpong, and every side trusts that the other will act in its stead, throwing the responsibility back and forth.”
According to Sasson, the army is shirking its duty to protect Palestinians. It can do so because there is no strong political leadership insisting they be protected.
“The problem is not a legal problem,” she commented. “From a legal point of view, it is clear that the army is obliged to do this. It is a problem of implementation.”
“The change needed is a political change,” Sasson said. “If the government… wanted to bring order in the West Bank, including stopping the violation of law against Palestinians, it could.”
Some human rights activists believe that the problem is simpler to fix. Lior Yavne, spokesman for Yesh Din, said that the military’s upper echelons do accept that the military has a responsibility to protect Palestinians from settler violence. “But we know from being on the ground and from speaking to soldiers that they are just not being briefed on this,” he said.
B’Tselem spokesman Ofir Feuerstein agreed: “Somewhere in the chain of command — I can’t tell you where — this is being lost.”
Others see the problem as more intractable. According to Peace Now general secretary Yariv Oppenheimer, “There is a fear among Israeli soldiers and in the army to confront settlers. They know that settlers can bring more people and more clashes.”
Equally pessimistic was Daniel Schueftan, a Haifa University political scientist who was a senior security adviser to numerous Israeli prime ministers. Schueftan is widely credited with placing disengagement and the separation barrier on the political agenda.
“The army has a problem because it has no authority over Israeli civilians in the West Bank and police is very thin on the ground,” Schueftan said.
But with support for terror strong among Palestinians, and radicalism growing among settlers, “The idea you can do away with it by more law enforcement is too optimistic to be relevant for the Middle East,” Schueftan said. “Maybe if you were talking about Switzerland, it would be different.”
He continued: “This has been happening here for a long time and will continue happening. Little can be done about it. Without a fence and Palestinians on one side and Israelis on the other, this will inevitably, with 100% certainty, continue happening.”
You can read further at
The Problem.
You can read further at
Guide to "Checks and Balances".
You can read further at
The Solution.
Article located at:
http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2010/333_JewPogrom.html
|
Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian:
Harmonious Union
of
Church and State
|
