A saying I always heard in growing up was that you "Fight fire with Fire".

Of course, we believed we were doing so when we invaded their countries with all our military might and installed "Compassionate Conservative" Muslims into office in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Since Islam was born to fight -- born to Jihad -- what we accomplished was a reawakening of a slumbering Islam.

And since Christianity was born to peace -- born to turn the other cheek -- what we really accomplished was a betrayal of our own religious principles when we took up arms against Islam.

This is a battle Islam is equipped to win and one Christianity is equipped to lose.

All we did was give Muslim terrorists a local target to aim for. Indeed, the theory was to take the fight to the Muslims -- and we did so in spades.

How did that turn out? 

As this article is being written, radical Muslims are advancing in jihad on Baghdad to slay moderate Muslims.

From the start, a quick and simple solution for America  would have entailed expelling all our Muslim criminals (In no inexact terms -- that would be all Muslims) and locking them up in the penitentiary of the Middle East where they could no longer do the civilized world any damage, but instead, we left our local Muslims in place inside the United States with the full faith and protection of the federal government telling us to be good Christians and not harm our Muslim "guests" -- who the Feds let immigrate our country.

Intead, we "took the fight to them". Clearly, we Christians do not rape and pillage like a true Muslim, so our response to fanatical Islam was fighting a forest fire with a match stick.

Compassion against the enemy in not a word Islam understands.

In the advance of Islam, surrounding Christian countries to Muslim countries do not have our luxury. Islam invades their porous borders and then dominates by among other tactics, kidnapping innocent children and raising them to be the next Islam jihadists against their own kin.

The Ottoman Turks perfected this technique so well they had a name for it -- Janissaries.

In the 1300s the Ottoman Turks kidnapped young Christian boys and essentially brainwashed them into being loyal to the Sultan, the ruler of the Ottoman Empire. Hard-trained, these boys became the elite military unit in the Middle East, and perhaps Europe. They were called Janissaries. Interestingly, Islam prohibited the use of Muslim boys under the age of 15 in war, but made no such protections for Christians or Jews The History of Child Soldiers

Of course, the object of kidnapping Christian women is to fill harems and quickly produce many Muslim boys as well for jihadi cannon fodder.

A quick and simple solution for surrounding Christian countries would have them reverse the Muslim game plan and kidnap hundreds of Muslim girls and boys.

"But, but" you say, "Christian Solution, that is not Christian".

Indeed it is Christian as Christians believe in free will  -- and in Christ being the only means of salvation.

Taking Muslim girls and boys away from Islamic criminal parents would give these poor children an actual chance in life - a chance in salvation.

We would be treating these children as we would want to be treated. Since the parents are criminals, we are not obliged to treat them as we would want to be treated. Indeed, if we commit crimes OR SUPPORT crimes against humanity in the name of our religion, we would expect to be punished by our civilized brethren. 

Muslim children have no viable choice in life.  It's either Islam or death!

In a fight fire with fire scenario, Christians need to start invading Muslim areas, taking their children and allowing their children to convert to a more enlightened and peaceful religion, as  Ann Coulter is famously vilified for saying.

And perhaps, just perhaps, there may be a beneficial Muslim blow back -- Muslims may not like the new way we fight Islam and stop taking our Christian children.

Indeed, Turkish Muslims were stopped and no longer engage in the Janissary system against Christians.  It can be done.