As Rush would say, "This is not that complicated".


That is the Jewish definition, not mine.

Naturally, most American Christians believe news coming from non-Christian, dual-citizen of Israel, news organizations are the ones who are the actual fake news. 

If the message is anti-American and anti-Christian, then it cannot be real, as America and Christianity are the best, right?

Until the Internet arrived, all the news was totally Kosher certified.

In fact, after the arrival of the Internet, the news is still pretty much totally Kosher...

1.   Fox News was welcomed as a fresh change but when the dust settled, Rupert Murdock is 100% Kosher.

1.   Breitbart News was welcomed as alt-news, yet again Breitbart was a Kosher dude.

1.  Drudge Report is a widely read source of counter information, but sorry, Drudge is also Kosher.

1.  Google, Twitter and Facebook are new as a baby, but could not get more Kosher.

Still, a near monopoly on Kosher is not a total Kosher monopoly, so the Kosher News is currently correcting the situation by putting in place methods to censor what they have created out of thin air to be the non-kosher "fake news".


So naturally the Kosher MSM cannot help themselves. Their "final solution" to this bad perception of their un-trustworthiness is NOT to regain our trust, but instead, to lose our trust even more by trying to brainwash us into believing that Christian news is "fake news".

---

---

Back in the 1950's, when Russia was ruled by the cruel iron hand of Jewish Commissars, patriot Americans who questioned Russian (i.e. Jewish) influence on American society in Hollywood and TV were given the label McCarthyism by the Jewish press for wanting to impose censorship in the name of national security.

"Free Speech" was the Judeo-MSM selling point for the garbage they were pushing, and Americans bought this hook, line, and sinker. The resultant win for them was their kosher news became the only "free speech" Americans ever heard from their TV news and from their newspapers and magazines for the next 50 years.

The McCarthy episode marked the turning point in control of this great country. Ever since then, Politically Correct labels of McCarthyism, Hitlerism, Nazism, Racism, Sexism, and recently minted labels of Misogynist, Homophobe and Islamophobe have kept Christians safely in their place.

But cracks in the Judeo Iron Curtain of Political Correctness started to appear.

Ronald Reagan put a spike in their Jewish dream state of the Soviet Socialist Republics.  Ouch!!! 

This was only a temporary reprieve, and while Americans relaxed,  those Russian Commissar Jews, with their families, left the Soviet Union for Israel and to America, where they reinforced control over America, creating in America a full pledged American Socialist Republic.

Bill, Hillary and Obama were busy putting stakes in the heart of America while the Bushes were place-markers to delineate the regime changes, often with One-World-Government plans of their very own.

Meanwhile, over in the former Soviet Union, a new day had dawned.

Vladimir Putin finally stabilized the chaotic post-Soviet era and brought prosperity back to his country.

Putin is the first leader to show the world that Christians can indeed re-take and rule their own country again.

Nothing shows this better than the rebuilding of the National Cathedral known as Christ the Savior, first erected to celebrate the retreat of the atheist French under Napoleon on Christmas Day, 1812 AD.

Putin opened up a new threat to the kosher news organizations.

The central kosher theme of "fake news" is that Putin, a strong Christian leader, was trying to help America elect a strong Christian leader.

"The horrors of this new McCarthyism", said the Jewish media!!!

No, wait... they are now the ones engaging in McCarthyism!!!

The old McCarthyism was the Jewish media going after our government leaders who were going after the Jewish entertainment-infotainment monopoly complex. 

The new McCarthyism is the Jewish media, holding the hands of Democrat government leaders, going after new media allowed by the opening of the Internet.

"Free Speech" this time cannot be the selling point. Instead, censorship in the name of national security is the selling point.

Perhaps the kosher press can successfully sway Americans into allowing them to enforce a "national security" censorship of ideas coming from a free, democratic Christian country of Russia, and American Christians wanting free speech will not succeed.  Indeed, the kosher press are fantastically persuasive.

---

---

You have to push back at these Judeo-talking heads saying that "Fake News" is what elected Trump.

Here is an example of real fake news...

"Experts say" and so say "Independent researchers" so gosh, we must believe this.

But how so exactly does this Washington Post article square when compared to their previous news reports of the sterling governance of our country?

Obama is "the smartest man who ever lived" -- protecting and defending America from all enemies both foreign and domestic. Surely this brainy president, often called by the MSM as "The Messiah", protected us well from foreigners far better than any and every previous president we have had, and Obama must have especially protected his own Democrat party better than that even, right?

Hillary is "the smartest woman who ever lived", having huge inputs of money and advice from all over the world. She was focused by $1.5 billion in her campaign to sense any disturbance in this election.

The Silicon Valley controllers of the Internet are "the smartest people who ever lived", and safely controlled the campaign messages of both, as we are surely led to believe.

Obama's NSA is "the most monitoring of citizens who has ever been monitored throughout history", and from what Snowden told us, nothing could have gotten past them.  After all, we never had a "National Security Agency" to protect our communications before. We were warned of cyber attacks, and thus cyber attack drills were contemplated, planned and executed endlessly. Nothing could have gotten past Obama's NSA.

Obama's Government Common Core Public Schools are, after 250 years, finally turning out "the smartest kids who ever existed on this planet".

I know all this because I've read it all in the Washington Post.

And yet, per the Washington Post, Americans are "ignorant without critical thinking skills", helping foreign leader Putin to subvert our elections, thus making Trump President.

I call Washington Post BS on this and call the kosher news to all be fake news.

---

---

The Judeo-MSM received a systemic shock on Nov 8th and are now on a mission to insure this America First belief of Americans cannot continue to grow.

The kosher news must protect their legacy at all costs....

1.  You must not be ashamed for being a single mother, but must shout it out to the world.

1.  You must not be ashamed of being a man who likes men. No, others must lose their jobs if they disagree.

1.  You cannot be allowed to be proud to be an American, you must be proud to have diversity.

1.  You cannot have faith in God and Constitution, you must have faith in gay bathroom inclusion.

By self-defining what they don't like as "fake news", the Kosher MSM are in the process of censoring all the news you receive.

1.  When Kosher Google sees "fake news", they will not send you the search link.

1.  When Kosher Twitter sees "fake news", they will not send you a tweet.

1.  When Kosher Facebook sees "fake news", they will not allow it to rise in ranking.

1.  When Kosher Breitbart does not like your anti-Kosher comments, they permanently delete your commenting privileges without warning and without appeal (as they personally did to me).

Of course, all this is not "news".

Ron Paul and Rand Paul have never made an anti-Kosher comment in their entire lifetime, but the effects of their America-first thinking would be anti-Kosher to Jewish desires of globalism, so they are defined as "fake news" and just ignored.

Much the same with President Trump, but he can't be ignored.

His America-first agenda threatens to dismantle the nightmare of what they have worked so hard to construct over the last 100 years, so Trump must be labeled anti-Kosher with every word they write.

Nothing the Kosher-certified DNC ever said was considered fake news or anti-Kosher, so everything the DNC told the news to report for them, they unquestionably reported as requested.

---

---

Now that you have an open mind and can see what you were not able to see before, may we show you some more "fake news"?

On a more fundamental level, pretty much anything the Judeo-MSM tells you about your Christian religion or their Jewish religion is Kosher and so is defacto anti-Christian "fake news".

1.  Jews are NOT the Chosen People anymore, Christians are.

1.  Jews can NOT claim the Promised Land anymore, The Kingdom is now of Heaven.

1.  Israel was NOT a Jewish nation, but a Christian land, viciously invaded in 639 AD and occupied by hostile Muslims who were only helped by a fifth column of Jews, who deeply resented the fact that the Muslims never turned Jerusalem back over to them after Jews helped the Muslims defeat and wipe out the Christians.

1.  Jews are NOT the ones persecuted more often

1.  Jews are the originators of all destructive revolutionary movements in Western Christian Civilization

1.  Jews do start all the wars, exactly as Mel Gibson says

1.  Modern Israel is by nature an undemocratic apartheid state, ran by and for Jews, who violates every principle of Jewish Progressive thought in terms of self-rule, inclusion, tolerance, being anything but a Democracy in the eyes of native Palestinians, whom the Jews have trained Westerners to hate, even as their Muslim cousins are to be welcomed with open hands in all other Christian countries where they do not have a right to live.

1.  Christians who support the nation Israel over any other nation, most importantly over their own country, are violating the First Amendment of the Constitution by placing the religion of Israel with its religious belief of a Promised Land for a Chosen People, above the religion of Christ, which should really guide their own heart.
   

---

Source West Already Weaponizing Fake News Finian Cunningham 19:56 23.11.2016(updated 20:02 23.11.2016) You really know that masses of people are living within a mind-control matrix when the greatest, most pervasive purveyors of fake news denounce others for the practice. And yet they do so without the slightest hint of awareness about their own monstrous hypocrisy. "Fake news" has become a hot issue following the surprise US election victory of maverick business tycoon Donald Trump. Supposedly serious Western media outlets have highlighted the spread of hoax stories purporting to be news reports as having swayed the presidential race in Trump’s favor against his rival, Democrat career politician Hillary Clinton. One such hoax "report" was that Pope Francis had allegedly given his blessing to Trump just before the November 8 poll, which presumably prompted some American Catholics on board the Republican’s election ticket. No doubt, the internet is a plentiful source of false rumor and other bizarre, tall stories. But now, it seems, Western corporate media giants are calling for Facebook and other social networking sites to weed out "fake news". Given how wrong the US media called the election and also their rabid bias against Trump, the hunt for a scapegoat is understandable. US media mogul Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO, seems ready to comply with demands to provide a team of censors against the spread of fictive reports. Even though, he claims that the vast majority of news links on his worldwide network are to genuine, factual content. This is setting a sinister precedent for abusive, systematic censorship. Unfortunately, control of global information is prone to subjective Western cultural and political bias. Already we see how it is Western media outlets who are making an issue over "fake news" and it is Western-based internet companies like Facebook and Google who are taking on the mantle of filtering out content. It is not hard, therefore, to imagine how this train of thought could be applied eventually to non-Western news services that supply information critical of Western government interests an conduct. Take, for example, the war in Syria. Russian news media have provided many important, documented reports and analyses on how Washington and its Western allies are systematically colluding with jihadi terror groups to prosecute a covert, criminal war for regime change against the elected government of Syria. By contrast, the Western corporate media have rarely if ever given any coverage to such verifiable violations by their governments in Syria. Or in any other recent conflict for that matter, such as in Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Georgia. Of course, this is because Western media outlets are part of the ideological, propaganda matrix that serves to conceal the crimes of Western governments, which, in turn, serve to facilitate the strategic interests of Western corporations. Western so-called news services do on occasion publish outright fake news, such as when Iraq was accused of possessing weapons of mass destruction in the run-up to the US-led war in 2003. But far more often, the informational fare is less crudely fabricated and more subtly finessed with distortions and omissions of crucial facts and context. Still, that is tantamount to fake news, no less. This week, Western newspapers and TV channels were reporting on how Russia was "destabilizing European security" by installing Iskander missiles and the S-400 defense system in its territory of Kaliningrad – the exclave between Lithuania and Poland. The supposedly august London Times headlined its report thus: "Putin moves his missiles in new threat to Europe". The foreboding tone is typical of the constant flow of Western media reports over many months alleging that Russian warships and warplanes are menacing European territories. From Britain’s Daily Mail to America's New York Times we have been told since at least last year that Russian troops were about to invade the Baltic states. No matter that Moscow, including President Vladimir Putin and his top diplomat Sergei Lavrov, has repeatedly dismissed the allegations of Russian aggression. Undeterred, the Western "news stories" just keep being churned out as if by a manic conveyor belt. As always, this week's Western Russian-scare episode was spun and disseminated without the appropriate, crucial context. The installation of missiles on Russia's western-most territory comes after the US-led NATO military alliance announced plans last month to greatly escalate troops on Russia's border. The Kaliningrad move also follows the deployment of US missile systems in Romania earlier this year. Evidently, Russia's latest military measures are in response to US and NATO offensive steps, or as Putin told American film director Oliver Stone in an interview aired this week, the Russian moves are "counter-measures". Washington and its NATO allies justify their reckless escalation on Russia's borders as "defensive response" to alleged Russian intervention in Ukraine in 2014 and Georgia in 2008. But such Western claims are easily disputable, indeed rendered baseless if given to objective scrutiny. The trouble is, however, Western media have by and large not allowed factual reportage to intrude on their pre-ordained narrative of impugning and demonizing Russia. What we see is a systematic information campaign – bluntly, propaganda – that propagates fake news upon fake news in order to justify Western strategic interests. Those interests include: propping up NATO and the Western military-industrial complex that is so vital to sustain late capitalist economies; as well as subjugating Russia and its enormous natural resources for exploitation by Western corporations. In this perspective, fake news about the Pope backing Donald Trump or about Hillary Clinton's health condition is a trifle. The real perpetrators of fake news are professional media conglomerates that pound TV channels and internet screens every second of every day, with the diabolical risk of igniting all-out global war. This corporate-controlled fake news about alleged Russian aggression in Europe or purported violations in Syria and Ukraine is correlated with the sanitizing of real news about how Western governments are supporting terrorists in Syria, or aiding and abetting state-sponsored slaughter of civilians in Yemen. So pervasive is this matrix that the systematic purveyors of fake news can turn around and, with a straight face, pontificate to others about the "ethics of journalism". What is truly alarming is that the West’s weaponization of information – self-declared as independent, free-thinking – has become so inculcated that real, alternative news could end up being banished from public access. Dissenting news sites, including many that are based in the West and elsewhere, including Russian's RT and Sputnik, often convey context and facts that upend Western official narratives. Just because those alternative news perspectives might appear outlandish to grossly distorted Western narratives, will they then be subject to censorship? Accusing Western governments of sponsoring terrorism or fabricating "Russian aggression" could, plausibly, seem like fake news if control of the internet were given over to a coterie of Western-based monitors. But such designation of "fake news" is only due to oblivious cultural arrogance and indoctrination. Maybe the internet will not succumb to the latest Western crusade against "fake news". However, considering how so much of Western "news" is already weaponized and when you consider the deeper malign purposes that it truly serves, then the practice of creeping censorship is never too far away. SOURCE: Trump's Election Victory Proves US Mainstream Media Worthless, Ex-Diplomat Says 03:24 22.11.2016(updated 07:43 22.11.2016) The US presidential vote outcome has proved "bias and general worthlessness" of mainstrean media as a source of information, retired Canadian diplomat Patrick Armstrong told Sputnik. © REUTERS/ Jim UrquhartTrump's Election Win Indicates Americans Reject Clinton's ‘Pay-to-Play’ PoliticsWASHINGTON (Sputnik) — US public distrust of the mainstream media, or MSM, is now so great that the more they attacked Donald Trump during the presidential election, the more his credibility and popularity grew, Armstrong said. "One of the reasons Trump won was that the more the MSM reviled him, the more support he gained: if the liars accuse him of something, he must be innocent of it," Armstrong explained. A survey by research firm TNS UK, commissioned by Sputnik and released Thursday, showed that 80 percent of Americans considered domestic media coverage of the 2016 campaign was biased toward one or the other of the major-party nominees. Armstrong said he believed the 80 percent distrust figure was in reality too low and that an even higher percentage of Americans refused to believe the distortions they were fed through the New York and Washington-based national media. "Why as few as 80 percent? The bias and general worthlessness of the MSM as a source of information has been apparent for years," he said. The corporate controllers of the main US broadcast, print and online media platforms had been certain Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would win the national election and had rallied to support her, Armstrong explained. "In this particular case, as WikiLeaks shows, the owners of the US media had invested in a Clinton future and the Clintons had invested in the media," he noted. The extremely biased and hostile coverage of Trump, Russia and other subjects would continue while the media and its spokespersons would go on denying that such bias even existed, although it was now obvious to everyone, Armstrong predicted. "The principal difference between [tiny local news outlets like] the Eatanswill Gazette and the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Economist and the rest of them is that the former freely admitted its bias," he added. Armstrong advised that the only way the American public could continue to retain its independence of mind in the face of such sustained efforts to politically brainwash it was to abandon the mainstream media entirely and opt for alternative and independent sources. He also recommended that US colleges close down their schools of journalism that had completely failed to inculcate values and habits of independent thinking and critical analysis in almost all of their graduates. "What to do? Turn off your TV, cancel your newspaper subscription and let them go bust faster. Oh, and shut down all the ‘journalism degree’ mills," Armstrong said. Until his retirement, Armstrong was a Canadian diplomat who was a specialist on the Soviet Union and Russia. He previously served as political counsellor in the Canadian Embassy in Moscow.

---