The Christian Solution |
C S | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Home Page About TCS Contact Us Document Library | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
February 2022 AD
When Hitler tried to make Germany all about Germany, the world Jewry came crashing down on him. Putin is today's Hitler. No, not the bad demon the Jews portray Hitler to be, but the Christian Crusader trying to defend Christianity. Jews have turned the Ukrain into their playpen and they are not anymore happy having Putin invade than they were when Hitler invade Poland to free Germans stuck in Poland. THE JEWISH HAND IN WORLD WAR THREEFree Speech versus CatastropheThanks
to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, we indeed seem to be rushing
headlong into a major war—possibly a World War Three, possibly the
world’s first (and perhaps last) nuclear war. Ukraine leadership and
their Western backers seem hell-bent on fighting to the last man, and
Vladimir Putin, as an old-school Cold Warrior, seems equally determined
to press ahead until achieving “victory.” The
cause seems hopeless for Ukraine, who cannot reasonably expect to
prevail in an extended conflict with one of the largest militaries on
Earth. At best, they may bleed Russia over a period of months or years,
but only at the cost of massive blood-letting themselves. It seems that
Ukraine will be the loser in this struggle, no matter what comes. In the Western media, we are presented with a remarkably simplified story-line:
Putin is an evil warmonger who simply wants to extend Russian
territory; to this end, he is exploiting events in Ukraine, deploying
his military ostensibly to support the Russian-speaking districts of
Luhansk and Donetsk in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine. But this
is just cover, they say, for his mad quest to rebuild the Russian
empire. In pursuit of his goal, he is willing to inflict any amount of
material damage and kill any number of civilians. Fortunately, say our
media, Putin has thus far been largely contained; the brave Ukrainian
fighters are constantly “reclaiming” land, Russia’s advance has “stalled,” and indeed, Russia seems to be in danger of losing. Consequently, the US and its allies must do all they can to “aid” and “support” the
brave Ukrainians and their beleaguered but heroic leader, Volodymyr
Zelensky. No amount of money, no assortment of deadly weaponry, no
military intelligence, is too much. Like World War Two, this “war” is
an unconditional struggle of Good versus Evil; therefore the West, as
the moral paragon of the world, must step up, undergo sacrifice, and
ensure that Good prevails. And
indeed, the financial support from just the United States is
breathtaking: As of early May, Congress has approved $13.6 billion in
aid, much of it for direct Ukrainian military support. And yet this
would only cover costs through September. Thus, president Biden
recently called for an additional package of $33 billion, which would
include over $20 billion in military and security aid, and,
surprisingly, $2.6 billion for “the deployment of American troops to the region,” in order to “safeguard NATO allies.” Incredibly, Congress responded by approving $40 billion,
bringing the total aid thus far to $54 billion. For perspective, this
represents over 80% of Russia’s annual defense budget of $66 billion.
(By contrast, America allocates well over $1 trillion—that is, $1,000
billion—annually in direct and indirect military expenditures.) Notably,
such unconditional support and defense of Ukraine is a virtually
unanimous view across the American political spectrum, and throughout
Europe. Right and left, conservative and liberal, working class or
wealthy elite, all sectors of society are apparently united in
opposition to the evil Putin. In an era when virtually no issue garners
unanimous support, the Ukrainian cause stands out as an extremely rare
instance of bipartisan, multi-sector agreement. The rare
dissenters—such as Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and a handful of alt-right
renegades—are routinely attacked as “Russian assets” or “tools of Putin.” There is no room for disagreement, no space for debate, no opposing views allowed. In fact, though, this is yet another case of what I might call the “unanimity curse”: when all parties in American society are united on a topic, any topic, then we really need
to worry. Here, it seems that the reality is of a potent Jewish Lobby,
exerting itself (again) in the direction of war, for reasons of profit
and revenge against a hated enemy. There
is, indeed, a Jewish hand at work here, one that may well drive us into
another world war, and even a nuclear war—one which, in the worst case,
could mean the literal end of much of life on this planet. The
unanimity comes when all parties are subject, in various ways, to the
demands of the Lobby, and when the public has been misled and even
brainwashed by a coordinated Jewish media into believing the standard
narrative. The
best cure for this catastrophic situation is unrestricted free speech.
The Lobby knows this, however, and thus takes all possible measures to
inhibit free speech. Normally, such a struggle ebbs and flows according
to the issue and the times; but now, the situation is dire. Now more
than ever, a lack of free speech could be fatal to civilized society. CONTEXT AND RUN-UPTo
fully understand the Jewish hand in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, we
need to review some relevant history. Over the centuries, there have
been constant battles over the lands of present-day Ukraine, with
Poles, Austro-Hungarians, and Russians alternately dominating. Russia
took control of most of Ukraine in the late 1700s and held it more or
less continuously until the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991; this
is why Putin claims that the country is “part of Russia.” For
their part, Jews have experienced a particularly tumultuous
relationship with Russia, one that ranged from disgust and detestation
to a burning hatred. As it happened, Jews migrated to Russia in the 19th century,
eventually numbering around 5 million. They were a disruptive and
agitating force within the nation and thus earned the dislike of Czars
Nicholas I (reign 1825 to 1855), Alexander II (1855 to 1881, when he
was assassinated by a partly-Jewish anarchist gang), and especially
Nicholas II (1894 to 1917)—the latter of whom was famously murdered,
along with his family, by a gang of Jewish Bolshevists in 1918. Already
in 1871, Russian activist Mikhail Bakunin could refer to the Russian
Jews as “a single exploiting sect, a sort of bloodsucker people, a collective parasite”.[1] The
assassination of Alexander initiated a series of pogroms that lasted
decades, and which set the stage for a lingering Jewish hatred of all
things Russian.[2] For
present purposes, though, we can jump to the 2004 Ukrainian
presidential election (I note that Ukraine also has a prime minister,
but unlike most European countries, he typically has limited powers). In 2004, it came down to “the two Viktors”:
the pro-Western V. Yushchenko and the pro-Russian V. Yanukovych. The
first round was nearly tied, and thus they went to a second round in
which Yanukovych prevailed by around three percentage points. But amid
claims of vote-rigging, Western Ukrainians initiated an “Orange Revolution”—backed
by the Ukrainian Supreme Court—that annulled those results and mandated
a repeat runoff election. The second time, the tables were turned, and
the pro-West Yushchenko won by eight points. The West was elated, and
Putin naturally mad as hell. The
following years witnessed financial turmoil and, unsurprisingly,
constant harassment from Russia. By 2010, Ukrainians were ready for a
change, and this time Yanukovych won handily, over a Jewish female
competitor, Yulia Timoshenko—notably, she had “co-led the Orange Revolution.” Russia, for once, was satisfied with the result. But
of course, in the West, Europe and the US were mightily displeased, and
they soon began efforts to reverse things yet again. Among other
strategies, they apparently decided to deploy the latest in high tech
and social media. Thus in June 2011, two of Google’s top
executives—Eric Schmidt and a 30-year-old Jewish upstart named Jared
Cohen—went to visit Julian Assange in the UK, then living under house
arrest. It is well-known, incidentally, that Google is a Jewish enterprise, with Jewish founders Sergei Brin and Larry Page running the ship.[3] The
nominal purpose of the trip was to conduct research for a book that
Schmidt and Cohen were working on, regarding the intersection of
political action and technology—in plain words, how to foment
revolutions and steer events in a desired direction. As Assange relates
in his 2014 book When Google Met Wikileaks, he
was initially unaware of the deeper intentions and motives of his
interviewers. Only later did he come to learn that Schmidt had close
ties to the Obama administration, and that Cohen was actively working
on political upheaval. As Assange wrote, “Jared Cohen could be wryly named Google’s ‘director of regime change’.” Their immediate targets were Yanukovych in Ukraine and Assad in Syria. By
early 2013, the American Embassy in Kiev was training right-wing
Ukrainian nationalists on how to conduct a targeted revolt against
Yanukovych. It would not be long until they had their chance. In
late 2013, Yanukovych decided to reject an EU-sponsored IMF loan, with
all the usual nasty strings attached, in favor of a comparable
no-strings loan from Russia. This apparent shift away from Europe and
toward Russia was the nominal trigger for the start of protest actions.
Thus began the “Maidan Uprising,” led in large part by two extreme nationalist groups: Svoboda and Right Sector.[4] Protests
went on for nearly three months, gradually accelerating in intensity;
in a notable riot near the end, some 100 protestors and 13 police were
shot dead. As
the Uprising reached its peak, at least one American Jew was highly
interested: Victoria Nuland. As Obama’s Assistant Secretary of State
(first under Hillary Clinton, and then under the half-Jew John Kerry), Nuland had direct oversight of events in eastern Europe.[5] And for her, it was personal; her father, Sherwin Nuland (born Shepsel Nudelman), was a Ukrainian Jew. She was anxious to drive the pro-Russian Yanukovych out of power and
replace him with a West-friendly, Jew-friendly substitute. And she had
someone specific in mind: Arseniy Yatsenyuk. On 27 January 2014, as the
riots were peaking, Nuland called American Ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff
Pyatt, to urgently discuss the matter. Nuland pulled no punches: “Yats” was
her man. We know this because the call was apparently tapped and the
dialogue later posted on Youtube. Here is a short excerpt:
It
was clear to both of them, though, that the EU leadership had other
ideas. The EU was much more anxious to be a neutral party and to avoid
direct intervention in Ukrainian affairs so as to not unduly antagonize
Russia. But in time-tested Jewish fashion, Nuland did not give a damn.
A bit later in the same phone call, she uttered her now-famous phrase: “Fuck the EU.” So much for Jewish subtlety.[6] But there was another angle that nearly all Western media avoided: “Yats” was also Jewish. In a rare mention, we read in a 2014 Guardian story that “Yatsenyuk
has held several high-profile positions including head of the country’s
central bank, the National Bank of Ukraine… He has played down his
Jewish-Ukrainian origins, possibly because of the prevalence of
antisemitism in his party’s western Ukraine heartland.” For some reason, such facts are never relevant to Western media. As
the Maidan Uprising gave way to the Maidan Revolution in February 2014,
Yanukovych was forced out of office, fleeing to Russia. Pro-Western
forces then succeeded in nominating “Yats” as
prime minister, effective immediately, working in conjunction with
president Oleksandr Turchynov. This provisional leadership was
formalized in a snap election in May 2014 in which the pro-Western
candidate Peter Poroshenko won. (The second-place finisher was none
other than Yulia Timoshenko—the same Jewess who had lost to Yanukovych in 2010.) It
was under such circumstances that Putin invaded and annexed Crimea, in
February 2014. It was also at this time that Russian separatists in
Donbass launched their counter-revolution, initiating a virtual civil
war in Ukraine; to date, eight years later, around 15,000 people have
died in total, many civilians. With
this American-sponsored coup finished, Ukrainian Jews began to reach
out to the West to increase their influence. Thus it happened that just
a few months after Maidan, the wayward son of the American vice
president got in touch with a leading Ukrainian Jew, Mykola Zlochevsky, who
ran a large gas company called Burisma. In this way, Hunter Biden
incredibly found himself on the board of a corporation of which he knew
nothing, in an industry of which he knew nothing, and which nonetheless
was able to “pay” him upwards of $500,000 per year—obviously, for
access to father Joe and thus to President Obama. Hunter carried on in
this prestigious role for around five years, resigning only in 2019, as
his father began his fateful run for the presidency.[7] Despite a rocky tenure, Yatsenyuk managed to hold his PM position for over two years, eventually resigning in April 2016. His replacement was yet another Jew, Volodymyr Groysman, who served until August 2019. The Jewish hand would not be stayed. All this set the stage for the rise of the ultimate Jewish player, Volodymyr Zelensky. This
situation is particularly remarkable given that Jews are a small
minority in Ukraine. Estimates vary widely, but the Jewish population
is claimed to range from a maximum of 400,000 to as low as just 50,000.
With a total population of 41 million, Jews represent, at most, 1% of
the nation, and could be as small as 0.12%. Under normal conditions, a
tiny minority like this should be almost invisible; but here, they
dominate. Such is the Jewish hand. ENTER THE JEWISH OLIGARCHSIn Ukraine, there is a “second government” that
calls many of the shots. This shadow government is an oligarchy: a
system of rule by the richest men. Of the five richest Ukrainian
billionaires, four are Jews:
Igor (or Ihor) Kolomoysky, Viktor Pinchuk, Rinat Akhmetov, and Gennadiy
Bogolyubov. Right behind them, in the multi-millionaire class, are Jews
like Oleksandr Feldman and Hennadiy Korban. Collectively, this group is
often more effective at imposing their will than any legislator. And
unsurprisingly, this group has been constantly enmeshed in corruption
and legal scandals, implicated in such crimes as kidnapping, arson and
murder.[8] Of
special interest is the first named above. Kolomoysky has long been
active in banking, airlines and media—and in guiding minor celebrities
to political stardom. In 2005 he became the leading shareholder of the
1+1 Media Group, which owns seven TV channels, including the highly
popular 1+1 channel. (The 1+1 Group was founded in 1995 by another Ukrainian Jew, Alexander
Rodnyansky.) Worth up to $6 billion in the past decade, Kolomoysky’s
current net wealth is estimated to be around $1 billion. Not
long after acquiring 1+1, Kolomoysky latched on to an up-and-coming
Jewish comedian by the name of Volodymyr Zelensky. Zelensky had been in
media his entire adult life, and even co-founded a media group, Kvartal
95, in 2003, at the age of just 25. Starring in feature films, he
switched to television by the early 2010s, eventually coming to star in
the 1+1 hit show “Servant of the People,” where he played a teacher
pretending to be president of Ukraine. Then there was the notable 2016 comedy skit in
which Zelensky and friends play a piano with their penises—in other
words, typical low-brow scatological Jewish humor, compliments of
Zelensky and Kolomoysky. By
early 2018, the pair were ready to move into politics. Zelensky
registered his new political party for the upcoming 2019 election, and
declared himself a presidential candidate in December 2018, just four
months prior to the election. In the end, of course, he won, with 30%
of the vote in the first round, and then defeating incumbent Poroshenko
in the 2nd round by a huge 50-point
margin. Relentless favorable publicity by 1+1 was credited with making
a real difference. Notably, the third-place finisher in that election
was, yet again, the Jewess Yulia Timoshenko—like a bad penny, she just keeps coming back.[9] Zelensky, incidentally, has dramatically profited from his “meteoric rise” to fame and power.
His Kvartal 95 media company earned him some $7 million per year. He
also owns a 25% share of Maltex Multicapital, a shell company based in
the British Virgin Islands, as part of a “web of off-shore companies” he helped to establish back in 2012. A Ukrainian opposition politician, Ilya Kiva, suggested recently that Zelensky is currently tapping into “hundreds of millions” in funding that flows into the country, and that Zelensky himself is personally earning “about $100 million per month.” A
Netherlands party, Forum for Democracy, recently cited estimates of
Zelensky’s fortune at an astounding $850 million. Apparently the “Churchill of Ukraine” is doing quite well for himself, even as his country burns. In
any case, it is clear that Zelensky owes much to his mentor and
sponsor, Kolomoysky. The latter even admitted as much back in late 2019, in an interview for the New York Times. “If I put on glasses and look back at myself,” he said, “I
see myself as a monster, as a puppet master, as the master of Zelensky,
someone making apocalyptic plans. I can start making this real” (Nov 13). Indeed—the Kolomoysky/Zelensky apocalypse is nearly upon us. Between
rule by Jewish oligarchs and manipulations by the global Jewish lobby,
modern-day Ukraine is a mess of a nation—and it was so long before the
current “war.” Corruption there is endemic; in 2015, the Guardian headlined a story on Ukraine, calling it “the most corrupt nation in Europe.” An international corruption-ranking agency had recently assessed that country at 142nd in
world, worse than Nigeria and equal to Uganda. As a result, Ukraine’s
economy has suffered horribly. Before the current conflict, their
per-capita income level of $8700 put them 112th in
the world, below Albania ($12,900), Jamaica ($9100), and Armenia
($9700); this is by far the poorest in Europe, and well below that of
Russia ($25,700 per person). Impoverished, corrupt, manipulated by
Jews, now in a hot war—pity the poor Ukrainians. HAIL THE AMERICAN EMPIREEnough
history and context; let’s cut to the chase. From a clear-eyed
perspective, it is obvious why Zelensky and friends want to prolong a
war that they have no hope of winning: they are profiting immensely
from it. As an added benefit, the actor Zelensky gets to perform on the
world stage, which he will surely convert into more dollars down the
road. Every month that the conflict continues, billions of dollars are
flowing into Ukraine, and Zelensky et al. are
assuredly skimming their “fair share” off the top. Seriously—who,
making anywhere near $100 million per month, wouldn’t do everything
conceivable to keep the gravy train running? The fact that thousands of
Ukrainian soldiers are dying has no bearing at all in Zelensky’s
calculus; in typical Jewish fashion, he
cares not one iota for the well-being of the White Europeans. If his
soldiers die even as they kill a few hated Russians, so much the
better. For Ukrainian Jews, it is a win-win proposition. Why does no one question this matter? Why is Zelensky’s corruption never challenged? Why are these facts so hard to find? We
know the answer: It is because Zelensky is a Jew, and Jews are
virtually never questioned and never challenged by leading Americans or
Europeans. Jews get a pass on everything (unless they are obviously guilty of something heinous—and sometimes even then!). Jews get a pass from fellow Jews because they cover for each other. Jews get a pass from media because the media is owned and operated by Jews. And Jews get a pass from prominent non-Jews who are in the pay of Jewish sponsors and financiers. Zelensky
can be as corrupt as hell, funneling millions into off-shore accounts,
but as long as he plays his proper role, no one will say anything. So the “war” goes on, and Zelensky and friends get rich. What
does Europe get from all this? Nothing. Or rather, worse than nothing:
They get a hot war in their immediate neighborhood, and they get an
indignant Putin threatening to put hypersonic missiles in their capital
cities in less than 200 seconds. They get to deal with the
not-so-remote threat of nuclear war. They get to see their currency
decline—by 10% versus the yuan in a year and by 12% versus the dollar.
They get a large chunk of their gas, oil, and electricity supplies diverted or shut off, driving up energy prices. And they get to see their Covid-fragile economies put on thin ice. But
perhaps they deserve all this. As is widely known, the European states
are American vassals, which means they are Jewish vassals. European
leaders are spineless and pathetic lackeys of the Jewish Lobby. Judenknecht like
Macron, Merkel and now Scholz, are sorry examples of humanity; they
have sold out their own people to placate their overlords. And the
European public is too bamboozled and too timid to make a change;
France just had a chance to elect Le Pen, but the people failed to
muster the necessary will. Thus, Europe deserves its fate: hot war,
nuclear threat, cultural and economic decline, sub-Saharan and Islamic
immigrants—the whole package. If it gets bad enough, maybe enough
Europeans will awaken to the Jewish danger and take action. Or so we
can hope. What about the US? We could scarcely be happier. Dead Russians, the hated Putin in a tizzy, and the chance to play “world savior” once
again. American military suppliers are ecstatic; they don’t care that
most of their weapons bound for Ukraine get lost, stolen or blown up,
and that (according to some estimates) only 5% make it to the front.
For them, every item shipped is another profitable sale, whether it is
used or not. And American congressmen get to pontificate about another
“good war” even as they approve billions in aid. And perhaps best of all, we get to press for an expansion to that American Empire known as NATO. We need to be very clear here: NATO is simply another name for the American Empire. The two terms are interchangeable. In no sense is NATO an “alliance among equals.” Luxembourg, Slovakia, and Albania have absolutely nothing to offer to the US. Do we care if they will “come to our aid” in
case of a conflict? That is a bad joke, at best. In reality, what such
nations are is more land, more people, and more economic wealth under
the American thumb. They are yet more places to station troops, build
military outposts, and run “black sites.” NATO always was, and always will be, the American Empire. The push for Ukraine to join NATO by the West-friendly Zelensky was yet another blatant attempt at a power grab
by the US, this one on Russia’s doorstep. Putin, naturally, took action
to circumvent that. But of course, now the push moves to Sweden and
Finland, both of whom are unwisely pursuing NATO membership in the
illusory quest for security, when in reality they will simply be
selling what remains of their national souls to the ruthless Judeo-American masters. For their sake, I hope they are able to avoid such a future. And all the while, American Jews and a Jewish-American media play up the “good war” theme,
send more weapons, and press ever further into the danger zone.
Ukrainian-American Jews like Chuck Schumer are right out front, calling
for aid, for war, for death.[10] “Ukraine
needs all the help it can get and, at the same time, we need all the
assets we can put together to give Ukraine the aid it needs,” said
Schumer recently, eager to approve the next $40 billion aid package. As
Jews have realized for centuries, wars are wonderful occasions for
killing enemies and making a fast buck. Perhaps it is no coincidence
that the present proxy war against Jewish enemies in eastern Europe
began not long after the 20-year war against Jewish enemies in
Afghanistan ended. Life without war is just too damn boring, for some. PUBLIC OUTRAGE?If more than a minuscule fraction of the public knew about such details, they would presumably be outraged. But as I mentioned, the Jewish-controlled Western media does
an excellent job in restricting access to such information, and in
diverting attention whenever such ugly facts pop up. The major
exception is Tucker Carlson, who is able to reach some 3 million people
each night; this is by far the widest reach for anything like the above
analysis. But Carlson falls woefully short—pathetically short—in
defining the Jewish culprit behind all these factors. Jews are never
outed and never named by Carlson, let alone ever targeted for blame.
This crucial aspect is thus left to a literal handful of alt-right and
dissident-right websites that collectively reach a few thousand people,
at best. And
even if, by some miracle, all 3 million Tucker viewers were enlightened
to the Jewish danger here, this still leaves some 200 million American
adults ignorant and unaware. The mass of people believes what they see
on the evening news, or in their Facebook feeds, or Google news, or on
CNN or MSNBC, or in the New York Times—all
Jewish enterprises, incidentally. This is why, when polled, 70% of the
American public say that current aid to Ukraine is either “about right” or even “too little.” This, despite the fact that around 50% claim to be “very concerned” about
nuclear war; clearly they are unable to make the necessary connections.
And for many, it is even worse than this: around 21% would support “direct American military intervention” against
Russia, which means an explicit World War Three, with all the
catastrophic outcomes that this entails. Our Jewish media have done
another fine job in whipping up public incitement. In sum, we can say that our media have cleverly constructed a “philo-Semitic trap”: any
mention or criticism of the Jewish hand in the present conflict is,
first, highly censored, and then, if necessary, is dismissed as
irrational anti-Semitism. Sympathy toward the (truly) poor, suffering
Ukrainians is played up to the hilt, and Putin and the Russians
relentlessly demonized. Leading American Jews, like Tony Blinken and
Chuck Schumer, are constantly playing the good guys, pleading for aid,
promising to help the beleaguered and outmanned Ukrainian warriors. Who
can resist this story-line?
Thus, we have no opposition, no questioning, no deeper inquiries into
root causes. Jews profit and flourish, Ukrainians and Russians suffer
and die, and the world rolls along toward potential Armageddon. The reality is vastly different. Global Jews are, indeed, “planetary master criminals,” as Martin Heidegger long ago realized.[11] They
function today as they have for centuries: as advocates for abuse,
exploitation, criminality, death and profits. This is self-evidently
true: if the potent Jewish Lobby wanted true peace, or flourishing
humanity, they would be actively pushing for such things and likely
succeeding. Instead, we have endless mayhem, war, terrorism, social
upheaval and death, even as Jewish pockets get ever-deeper. And the one
possible remedy for all this—true freedom of speech—recedes from our
grasp. On the one hand, I fear greatly for our future. On the other, I feel that we get what we deserve. When we allow malicious Jews to
dominate our nations, and then they lead us into war and global
catastrophe, well, what can we say? Perhaps there is no other way than
to await the inevitable conflagration, exact retribution in the ensuing
chaos, and then rebuild society from scratch—older and wiser. Notes
Article located at: http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2022/1052_Ukraine.html |
Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union of Church and State Must Read Classics Problem "Checks and Balances" Solution Complete Political Spectrum Holocaust Fraud Jewish Final Solution Progressive Tale Chosen People History of the World Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Jewish Century Great Sanhedrin Four Diasporas Four Diasporas Jewish Apartheid media-Scribe FRAUD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Christian Solution © First Release: March 15, 2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
