The Christian Solution |
C S | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Page About TCS Contact Us Document Library | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 2022 AD
Here is the "2000 mules" evidence of the Holocaust propaganda exposed and proved to be the total and blatant fraud it always was. Just like in 2000 mules, technology has uncovered and exposed the criminal lying. All we have to do is prove that the key lynch-pin for THE BIG LIE, that of the Auschwitz concentration camp, to be a lie all by itself and that one BIG LIE lie will expose the entire Holocaust story as an even BIGGER LIE. The rest of the world first learned of Enigma in 1974. We learned that the British had cracked the German Enigma code early in the war. This meant that the British knew where all the German subs were located. They knew when the German air raids would happen. They knew how the war was going in Russia. The Germans trusted Enigma with military intelligence on their army, navy and air force. Was not until 1981 that we found that Enigma was also used by the German police, SD and SS. The decoded records did not become available to the public until 1997. Of critical Important to world history, we finally found the real truth about what was happening at the German concentration camps with the Jews. Unfiltered by Jewish world news propaganda organizations. Did we find mass gassings? No Did we find mass crematoriums? No Did we find mass burials? No Did we find mass burning of bodies? No In the daily report back to Berlin, we find in the decoded Enigma messages that the major cause of death at Auschwitz to be disease like the ever present deaths due to typhus and find there were a few other deaths such as routine executions by hanging and firing squads or just plan old heart attacks and accidents and such. Instead of Holocaust level murders at Auschwitz of over 2,000 people per day, we find only 2,000 people per month dying or being transfered to other camps. This is a yearly difference of 24,000 versus the reported lie of 730,000. A large discrepancy indeed. Again, nothing in the decoded messages about Auschwitz meeting any proscribed agenda of a quota of gassings. No mention of gassing at all. Apologists suggest that Jews were immediately gassed upon arrival and hence were not reported to Himmler. But that is ridiculous. Why would a so-called genocidal killer like Himmler or Hitler not be interested to know how many Jews were killed but instead only wanted to know how many died of typhus? How would Berlin know how much Zyklon B to send for the gas chambers or how much coke to send for the crematories if the number of the Final Solution to the Jewish Question was not being reported accurately? Of course the answer is because there never was a Final Solution. Today too many sheep are lulled into belief but thankfully, today many now question every lie told about Trump by the Jewish propagandists, but we still seem to have a hard time questioning the lies of Jewish propagandists about the German people doing the Holocaust which has served the Jewish people so well. Again, you have to go to the grand theme of the day. Zionists needed action to establish Israel. They could not convince their average Jewish brethren to voluntarily uproot their comfy life in Europe to travel to the Middle East, surrounded by angry Arab Muslims facing a harsh life with none of the European civilization enticements like opera, plays, libraries, universities and great jobs. The Zionists needed to shake things up to accomplish their goals. Hitler gladly cooperated with the Zionists to round up the Jews and forcibly relocate them to the Ukrainian territories that the Soviet Jews had just ethnically cleansed of Ukrainians in the Holodomor. Then the Holocaust stories were crafty by Jewish play writes. After the war, the Jewish propaganda caused the entire world to grieve for the Jews which guilted them into helping establish Israel with money, travel, food, and military protection. And that is how Israel was created. By massive deceit and manipulation of Christians. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the full story of the Holocaust conspiracy taken from Inconvenient History | A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry by Christoph M. Wieland "THE ENEMY IS
LISTENING!"
What Did the British Intelligence Service Know about the
Holocaust?
In his book, The Ultra Secret,[1] published in 1974, author Frederick W. Winterbotham
revealed, for the first time,
that the British Intelligence Service was able to eavesdrop on almost all German military radio communications from a very early date, shortly after the
outbreak of World War II.
As a captain in the Royal Air Force and
officer of the Military Intelligence Service, Winterbotham supervised the work
of the Government Code & Cipher School in Bletchley Park, where cryptanalysts cracked the "Enigma" code used in German cipher machines to
scramble messages transmitted by the German army, navy and air force. Seven more years were fated to pass by
before the public was permitted to learn that Bletchley Park personnel were
capable of far more than simply reading written German military messages. In
1981, cryptanalyst Francis H. Hinsley published
British
Intelligence Service also eavesdropped on radio signals transmitted by the German police, SD and SS. This enabled the British
to obtain not only reliable information on events behind the Russian Front, but
on events in the German concentration camps as well. On 19 May 1997, the British government
transferred the decoded documents in Bletchley Park to the Public Records Office in London, thereby making them accessible to the public for research
purposes.[3] Oddly, only a very few Holocaust historians
were interested in the information on the concentration camps. The reason for
this astonishing lack of interest is presumably due to the following remark by
author Hinsley: The messages from
Auschwitz, the largest camp, with 20,000 inmates,[4] mention disease as the chief cause of death,
but also include references to executions by hanging and shooting. The decoded
messages contain no references to gassings.[5] The present article is intended to
summarize the information obtained at Bletchley Park on events in Auschwitz Concentration Camp. Despite Hinsley's unambiguous statement, British
Intelligence Service information continues to give rise to a multiplicity of
interpretations and speculation, just as before. At the same time, the question
of what the British "knew
about the Holocaust" always takes priority over everything else. As shown by the
Bletchley Park documents, the commandant of Auschwitz had to file a report
every single day. With the exception of Sunday, these messages consisted of
daily reports on population [Bestand], arrivals [Zugänge], and
departures [Abgänge] from the concentration camps. For over thirteen months, from January 1942 to January 1943, the British Intelligence Service
followed up and decoded these reports from Auschwitz Concentration Camp to the
SS Head Business Administration Office [SS-Wirtschafts-Verwaltungshauptamt] in Oranienburg. The decoded messages
enabled the compilation of very exact statistics. The radio messages from 28
October 1942 – taking a single day at random – reveal, for example, that
Auschwitz Concentration Camp contained a total, all told, of 25,298 inmates:
18,754 men and 6,544 women; including 10,755 Jews, 8,822 Poles, 1,369 Russians
and 1,578 Germans. It was also learned that there were exactly 787 Zugänge
and 168 Abgänge on 28 July 1942; Zugänge referred to the arrival
of new inmates; Abgänge referred to deaths, executions, releases and inmates transferred to other camps. These daily radio messages also
contained additional information related to Auschwitz. Thus, it was reported,
for example, that Jewish watchmakers were being transferred to Sachsenhausen
Concentration Camp; that Polish workers could only be sent elsewhere [verschickt]
after release from quarantine; that British POWs were considered to be urgently needed to work as kapos; and that efforts were being made to locate a
successor to the then-acting garrison doctor by September 1942. With regard to the Holocaust, the Abgänge
were naturally of particular interest. In actual fact, the monthly number of Abgänge
in the year 1942 fluctuated in an unusual manner. While the number of Abgänge
normally amounted to approximately 2,000 inmates per month, there was a great increase in these figures in July, August, September and October. For example,
8,352 Abgänge were reported for the month of August 1942. As is readily apparent from the radio
messages, this unusually high number of Abgänge was due to a typhus
epidemic at Auschwitz.[6] Typhus, sometimes also known as “camp fever”
is, as is well known, transmitted by fleas and lice; under poor hygienic circumstances
it will inevitably appear in almost any such camp. According to the
decoded radio messages, it took the Auschwitz authorities approximately four
months to bring the epidemic under control. The numbers only fell back down to
the average figure of approximately 2,000 Abgänge per month in November
and December 1942. Auschwitz Concentration Camp, as
mentioned above, had requested a successor to their current on-duty garrison physician in August 1942. This successor, who took over in his official
capacity on 6 September 1942, was Dr. Eduard Wirths. In his notes, Wirths left
a vivid report on conditions in Auschwitz at that time:[7] I found inconceivable
inmate conditions. There was no running water, no working toilets, no way to
bathe. The barracks lodging the prisoners were overfilled and there was a
shortage of beds. There were masses of lice all over the floors, clothing and
inmates' bodies. The walls were black with fleas. The condition of the inmates
was simply unbelievable, emaciated to their very bones, devoured by vermin,
with dead bodies lying around between living inmates. Hundreds of dying inmates were taken away, but sometimes they lay around among the living for days. It was obvious that the epidemic would
spread to the guard personnel as well. The Bletchley Park intercepts reported,
for example, that, on 4 September “the
entire camp was subjected to quarantine”[8] and “in
October, 11 SS-Men were hospitalized with suspected typhus.”[9] Wirths succeeded temporarily in
bringing the epidemic under control by building additional barracks, infirmaries,
installing additional drains and water pipes, latrines and targeted use of measures intended to combat infection: Through the chamber
of physicians [Ärztekammer], we applied or permission to distribute white
bread and milk. Instead of polluted drinking water, I took care to distribute
drinks such as coffee and tea. I ordered the organization of field kitchens for working inmates, due to the great distances between the worksites and their
living quarters and commissaries, which meant that otherwise the workers would
get no hot food all day. When the construction of field kitchens was
impracticable, I had hot food delivered to the work sites by vehicle. I
requested permission to allow recovering inmates to gather wild vegetables,
medicinal herbs. At the same time, I wanted Jewish women confined by the camp
administration to be able to move about in the open. I requested rest for
physically weakened inmates, even the construction of entire rest departments.[10] Dr. Wirths’s struggle against the
epidemics must have been a real labor of Sisyphus. Obviously, fresh cases of
typhus arrived in the camp with each new rail transport. Thus, on 28 January
1943, Bletchley Park issued a report to the effect that
22 January.”[11] In the summer of 1942, the first Polish
and Jewish reports appeared [12] alleging the commission of mass murder on an industrial scale in Auschwitz. According to these reports, 2,000 inmates were
being killed in gas chambers every day. Since the number of Abgänge reported
amounted to approximately 2,000 inmates per month, and not 2,000 inmates per
day, the British Intelligence Service rejected these reports as war propaganda.
Thus, the president of the British Joint Intelligence Committee, Victor
Cavendish-Bentinck, on 27 August 1943, wrote that the reports from Poles and
Jews were devoid of all basis in fact:[13] The allegations of mass executions in
gas chambers are reminiscent of the atrocity stories from the last war,
according to which the Germans were processing corpses into fat – a grotesque
lie, which was immediately unmasked as pure propaganda.
The first historian ever permitted to
examine the deciphered messages from Bletchley Park was Richard Breitman. In
his book, Official Secrets: What
the Nazis Planned, What the British and Americans Knew,[14] published in 1998, Breitman made serious
accusations against the Allies. As indicated in the translation back to English
of the German translation of his book – State Secrets: Nazi Crimes Tolerated by the Allies [Staatsgeheimnisse: Die Verbrechen der Nazis – von den Alliierten toleriert], he accuses the British and Americans of having known about the Holocaust from the very beginning, but of deliberately
concealing this information. In particular, he accused Cavendish-Bentinck of
rejecting the “Information from Polish and
Jewish sources as invented.” [15] This accusation is, however, entirely unjustified.
Why should Cavendish-Bentinck have accorded credibility to unreliable reports
when he was in possession of reliable radio messages from Auschwitz itself? That Cavendish-Bentinck rejected the
credibility of reports from Polish and Jewish underground sources is all the
more understandable when one reads some of the documents cited by Breitman.
Thus, for example, he reports that “a Polish underground courier who had succeeded in escaping to London” had
made the following statements on Auschwitz Concentration Camp:[16] I lived a few weeks
in Auschwitz.[…] Based on the information which I gathered, together with my
own observations, I can assure you that the Germans used the following killing methods. (A) Gas chambers: the
victims were forced naked into the chambers, where they suffocated. (B) Electrical
chambers: these chambers had metal walls. The victims were driven inside and
then killed by high-voltage electrical current. (C) The so-called
pneumatic hammer system: a pneumatic hammer designed to kill by means of
pneumatic pressure. Is it really so remarkable that
Cavendish-Bentinck considered such reports unworthy of belief? Obviously not.
Any similar report would be immediately rejected as false, even today. But there is more: According to
information provided by “a Polish woman with
the code name Wanda,” "98%
of all arrivals at Auschwitz were gassed.”[17] Auschwitz was a forced-labor camp
suffering from a severe shortage of manpower, as the officials at Bletchley
Park well knew. Why should Cavendish-Bentinck lend the slightest credence to
the allegation that 98% of all inmates were gassed immediately after their arrival? The British Intelligence Service had
every reason to consider the decoded radio messages of the SS the most reliable
source of information on events in Auschwitz. In view of the available data, it
was, therefore, furthermore assumed that the local mortality rates amounted to
approximately 2,000 per month, instead of 2,000 per day. According to the
figures reported by the SS, there were exactly 52,996 Abgänge in the
entire year of 1942. The unusually high number is, as stated above, attributable to the series of typhus epidemics which can easily be proven to
have broken out in the late summer of 1942. If there had been 2,000 deaths per
day in 1942, the number of Abgänge would have amounted to at least
730,000.
The figures decoded in Bletchley Park
obviously caused confusion among historians. The official number of Auschwitz victims amounts, as is well known, to 1 million. But how is it possible to
arrive at such a high figure based on the SS radio messages deciphered by the
British Intelligence Service? In an attempt to shore up the official
figure of Auschwitz victims, Breitman claims that the number of actual victims were subject to particularly severe measures of official censorship and
confidentiality when reported by radio:[18] Strict secrecy was
still maintained within the SS, regardless of Enigma. Top secret information
was still transmitted by courier only. This allegation is really not very
convincing. Why should the mass gassings at Auschwitz not be reported through
Enigma when the mass shootings on the Eastern Front were reported through
Enigma, i.e., in precisely the same way? Regardless of whether it was a matter
of mass executions in Riga, Minsk or Kiev – oddly, Breitman's book constantly
proves its points based on the reports from Bletchley Park, which the author obviously considers reliable. Just how arbitrary the above allegation
by Breitman really is, is made clear, last but not least of all, by the fact
that the Germans entrusted Enigma with information of crucial, even decisive,
information on their maneuvers, such as the current position of U-boats or the
exact dates involved in future German air attacks. Obviously less than completely
convinced by his own arguments, Breitman resorts, only a few pages further on,
to another explanation. Here, he states:[19] The statistics only
include inmates who were registered in the Auschwitz camps.[…] The statistics
nevertheless lack all mention of Jews who were selected for the gas chambers immediately after their arrival. What is the evidence for this
assumption? As Breitman himself had already stated,
“Himmler wanted to know how many inmates
were released, and how many died, in each.”[20] But if Himmler ordered the camps to report
the number of deaths, why should the commandant of Auschwitz withhold this same
number? Breitman's assumption appears to be a purely ad hoc hypothesis
intended simply to enable the writer to continue clinging to the official
number of victims at Auschwitz. Another book on Bletchley Park and the
Holocaust was published in 2004. Historian Nicholas Terry, in Yad Vashem
defended the British Intelligence Service
against Richard Breitman's accusations: the British Intelligence Service had,
in fact, according to him, discovered no clear evidence of extermination of
Jews based on radio messages deciphered at Bletchley Park. First of all, Terry straightens out a
misunderstanding on Breitman's part. Of course, an order was, in fact, actually issued on 13 September 1941 prohibiting all further reporting of victim numbers
by radio, but, rather, ordering that all such figures be communicated by
courier only; but this order only applied to the three Higher SS and Police
Leaders (HSSPF).[22] On 24 August 1941, Winston Churchill
had made the mistake, in a radio address, of denouncing the mass shootings
carried out behind the Russian front by the German Ordnungspolizei [NS
regular police].[23] Churchill's remarks remained, of course,
very vague, but aroused the suspicion on the part of the head of the German Ordnungspolizei,
Kurt Daluege, that the British had been eavesdropping on German radio reports. Daluege therefore issued an order to the heads of the Ordnungspolizei,
deciphered by the British, prohibiting the mention, for the time being, of
victim numbers by radio. In response to a suggestion by SS-Obergruppenführer
Friedrich Jeckeln, the victim figures were not, however, deleted, but, rather,
merely camouflaged, i.e., henceforth reported under the heading of "Action under the Customs of War."[24]
The decisive point is that the order
issued by Daluege was addressed to the HSSPF, not the SS. The Auschwitz Commandant's office therefore continued to report its Abgänge on a
regular basis. On 28 January 1943, Bletchley Park even reported that the
Oranienburg office issued an order to compile detailed statistics and to report
the exact numbers of deceased inmates and new arrivals.[25]
Like Richard Breitman, Nicholas Terry
also alleges that the people murdered immediately after their arrival were not included in the lists of Abgänge because they were never registered, but
were, instead, taken straight to the gas chambers.[26] This is, of course, entirely conceivable. But without a single document expressly ordering that inmates murdered in gas chambers
directly after their arrival should not be reported, the assumption
remains merely an ad hoc hypothesis. That this ad hoc hypothesis is
merely a far-fetched assumption is easily demonstrated by reference to a very few
simple considerations. How was the Reichsführer SS supposed to know how
the “Final Solution to the
Jewish Question" was progressing unless the commandant of Auschwitz regularly reported the fate of each individual incoming transport? It goes without saying
that Himmler had to be informed of the numbers of inmates arriving at
Auschwitz, being transferred to other concentration camps or being killed in
the gas chambers. The SS Head Business Administration Office [SS-Wirtschaft-Verwaltungshauptamt]
must have insisted upon exact statistics as well. Since it was responsible for all concentration camps, it would have needed to be informed, not only of the number
of able-bodied, working inmates, but the number of unregistered, non-able-bodied
inmates as well, even if only to justify the quantities of Zyklon B requested
for the gas chambers as well as for the requested quantities of coke for the
crematoria.
Altogether, it would be a gross
underestimation of German bureaucracy to assume that exact records were not kept
of every procedure. At Auschwitz, not a
single birth, death, delousing, release, punishment, execution, case of illness
or cremation could occur without being reported to Agency Group [Amtsgruppe]
D of the SS-WVHA in Oranienburg by the camp commandant's office. Finally, Jürgen Graf and Carlo Mattogno
have discovered numerous documents in the Moscow archives illustrating not only
the extent of German bureaucracy, but the unlikelihood of any Holocaust as
well. As one example, I would like to cite the report from Dr. Horst Fischer to
Dr. Eduard Wirths. In a letter dated 13 April 1943, the camp physician Dr.
Fischer at Buna wrote to the garrison physician Dr. Wirths informing him of the
arrival of 658 inmates at Auschwitz Camp. Of these 658 inmates, 109, after a
thorough medical examination, were found to be unable to work. And of these 109
non-able-bodied inmates, 25 were sent to one of the rest and recovery wards at Buna, 33 were sent to the inmate infirmary at Buna, and 51 were transferred to
the much better-equipped inmate hospital at Auschwitz I. To sum up, the following facts may be
considered established: The messages deciphered at Bletchley Park undoubtedly constitute one of the most reliable sources on the course of events during the
Second World War. They provide information on undertakings of the German army,
navy, and air force. They provide an insight into the events occurring behind
the Russian front and the conditions in the concentration camps. Since the
reports from Auschwitz contain no information on mass killings, the question of whether the British Intelligence Service "knew about the Holocaust," can be answered with a single word: "No!"[27] In view of the fact that the messages
from Auschwitz contain no mention of gas chambers or mass murders, the real question is: what was there really for anybody to "know" about? In other words: was there any Holocaust at all?
Regardless of the general belief that
hardly any historical event has ever been so thoroughly "proven," one must, once again,
expressly point out that, until
the present, not one single material or documentary proof for the reality of any
mass killings in gas chambers has ever been found. The only thing that exists, at most, is
mutually contradictory "eyewitness testimonies" and "confessions,"
which can, at least in the latter case, easily be shown to have been given
under duress. The most reliable documents on
Auschwitz – the Sterbebücher von Auschwitz,[28] the Kommandanturbefehle von Auschwitz[29] and the "radio messages from Auschwitz, deciphered by
the Allies”[30] – contain not the slightest reference
to mass killings by means of toxic gas. This is in addition to the fact that
the number of victims reported by the British Intelligence Service largely
coincide with the numbers
As already mentioned, Auschwitz
Concentration Camp reported a total of 52,996 Abgänge for the year 1942
as a whole. According to the "Death
Books," there
are supposed to have been a total of 36,958 deaths at Auschwitz in 1942. The fact that the numbers of Abgänge is greater than the number of deaths is
easily explained, since the term Abgänge includes, as mentioned above,
not only natural deaths and victims of execution, but also inmates who had been
released or transferred elsewhere. It is therefore entirely conceivable that the number of 36,958 deaths given in the "Death Books" for the year 1942 is quite correct. The existing discrepancy of 16,038 could reflect the number of inmates transferred to other camps or
released. Pending the discovery of a document unambiguously proving the gassing
of thousands of human beings at Auschwitz by Zyklon B, we are perfectly justified
in casting doubt upon the official version of the "Holocaust." Translated from German by Carlos W.
Porter
Article located at: http://www.thechristiansolution.com/doc2022/1054_Holofake.html |
Last Hope for America
Christian Libertarian: Harmonious Union of Church and State Must Read Classics Problem "Checks and Balances" Solution Complete Political Spectrum Holocaust Fraud Jewish Final Solution Progressive Tale Chosen People History of the World Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Jewish Century Great Sanhedrin Four Diasporas Four Diasporas Jewish Apartheid media-Scribe FRAUD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Christian Solution © First Release: March 15, 2008 |